Scottish Ballet's artistic director has confirmed reports that far from "stepping down" amicably, he's leaving because the board wouldn't extend his contract beyond a year.
Ashley Page said in a statement this morning that he's leaving "with great sadness and regret".
He'd asked the board for a five year contract when his tenure with the company ends in 2012.
Instead, they offered him one year, and according to Mr Page, made it quite clear they wanted new creative approaches and influences.
It's a short-sighted move.
The company came close to closure in the 1990s.
After the death of its founder, Peter Darrell, it struggled to rebrand itself.
Poor decision-making and a lack of finance further increased the downward spiral.
It failed to impress as a classical company under Galina Samsova.
Its reinvention as a modern ballet company under Robert North, is probably best forgotten.
Ashley Page - fresh from the Royal Ballet - was uncompromising in his approach.
He wanted a clean page and a radical clear-out of dancers.
He wanted more money for a slimmed down, modern company, capable of performing modern ballet.
The board obliged - even giving him the freedom of a nine month period of darkness so that the company could retrain and emerge refreshed and renewed.
The results spoke for themselves.
Critics loved the new company and the pared down, simple work.
Loyal audiences used to more traditional fare took slightly longer to win over but his Christmas offerings - dark versions of Cinderella, Sleeping Beauty and the Nutcracker - did the trick.
Scottish Ballet returned to perform at the Edinburgh International Festival - after an absence of more than two decades - and took it by storm.
In 2006, they performed in London for the first time in seven years.
In 2009, they toured overseas for the first time since 2001 and made their first visit to China in almost 20 years.
Their reinvention was complete.
So why is the board turning away the man who turned the company around?
By 2012, Page will have had a decade in the job.
Perhaps they feel it's time to give someone else with the same bullish, take-no-prisoners-approach, a chance to work their own magic.
At 54, they may feel Page needs a younger successor, someone who will forge new relationships with young and vibrant companies and choreographers.
But let's hope they have someone in mind - and are already making approaches.
While the company is in good shape - and the role of artistic director is a plum job - we live in uncertain times.
Cuts to the national company budgets are unavoidable.
Festivals and other showcases will have little money for new commissions.
Artistic ability will have to be tempered by a very real understanding of the economic climate.
The company may not face the dilemma they did more than a decade ago, working through a list of names and numbers and hoping someone - anyone - would salvage the company.
But it's still going to be a challenge - and having made the decision, they must pursue the right candidate with vigour and confidence.
Ashley Page views the decision with "great disappointment".
I suspect he's not the only one.